1 00:00:00,790 --> 00:00:07,320 [Music] 2 00:00:11,350 --> 00:00:08,999 [Applause] 3 00:00:13,660 --> 00:00:11,360 so most of you are familiar with the 4 00:00:15,879 --> 00:00:13,670 ironing world hypothesis which proposes 5 00:00:17,679 --> 00:00:15,889 that early in the evolution of life RNA 6 00:00:20,230 --> 00:00:17,689 serve both genetic and catalytic roles 7 00:00:22,870 --> 00:00:20,240 roles which have been taken over mostly 8 00:00:25,030 --> 00:00:22,880 by DNA and enzymatic proteins so one 9 00:00:27,999 --> 00:00:25,040 important tool for the RNA world would 10 00:00:30,549 --> 00:00:28,009 be having an RNA polymerase ribozyme not 11 00:00:32,709 --> 00:00:30,559 only able of self replication but also a 12 00:00:36,459 --> 00:00:32,719 more general transcription of an RNA 13 00:00:39,310 --> 00:00:36,469 template so a number of labs are looking 14 00:00:41,169 --> 00:00:39,320 into this and it all started with the in 15 00:00:43,239 --> 00:00:41,179 vitro selected class one ligase by 16 00:00:45,160 --> 00:00:43,249 Bartel and Shaw stack and it can 17 00:00:47,529 --> 00:00:45,170 catalyze the 3 prime to 5 prime 18 00:00:51,189 --> 00:00:47,539 phosphodiester bond formation of two RNA 19 00:00:53,410 --> 00:00:51,199 molecules with that is a starting point 20 00:00:55,450 --> 00:00:53,420 a second functional domain was in vitro 21 00:00:57,489 --> 00:00:55,460 selected and that donate domain was 22 00:00:59,559 --> 00:00:57,499 called an accessory domain and this 23 00:01:02,379 --> 00:00:59,569 transformed it from ligase to a 24 00:01:04,630 --> 00:01:02,389 polymerase and what this polymerase can 25 00:01:07,420 --> 00:01:04,640 do now is extend an RNA primer that's 26 00:01:10,270 --> 00:01:07,430 been hybridized on an RNA template in a 27 00:01:11,890 --> 00:01:10,280 template dependent manner however it 28 00:01:15,010 --> 00:01:11,900 does have a preference for gc-rich 29 00:01:17,590 --> 00:01:15,020 templates so the example shown here is B 30 00:01:20,020 --> 00:01:17,600 six point six one it was a polymerase 31 00:01:22,600 --> 00:01:20,030 ribozyme evolved later in our lab and 32 00:01:24,310 --> 00:01:22,610 what it can do is extend the primer by 33 00:01:26,320 --> 00:01:24,320 about twenty nucleotides in twenty-four 34 00:01:30,030 --> 00:01:26,330 hours so a major problem with these 35 00:01:32,710 --> 00:01:30,040 polymerases is a lack of processivity so 36 00:01:34,780 --> 00:01:32,720 they tend to dissociate from the primer 37 00:01:37,800 --> 00:01:34,790 template complex in between nucleotide 38 00:01:40,270 --> 00:01:37,810 additions so one solution that has been 39 00:01:42,220 --> 00:01:40,280 found and used to increase processivity 40 00:01:43,990 --> 00:01:42,230 by a number of labs such as the 41 00:01:46,750 --> 00:01:44,000 Hollinger and the Joyce lab was to 42 00:01:49,360 --> 00:01:46,760 directly hybridize that the polymerase 43 00:01:51,100 --> 00:01:49,370 or the ribozyme straight to the template 44 00:01:53,650 --> 00:01:51,110 that way you can dissociate away and 45 00:01:56,890 --> 00:01:53,660 this has resulted in extensions of up to 46 00:01:58,930 --> 00:01:56,900 200 nucleotides over seven days and this 47 00:02:02,710 --> 00:01:58,940 again is on GC rich templates with 48 00:02:05,800 --> 00:02:02,720 multiple repeats this is the latest 49 00:02:08,559 --> 00:02:05,810 Joyce ribozyme 24.3 and it was able to 50 00:02:12,009 --> 00:02:08,569 transcribe small functional RNAs 51 00:02:14,170 --> 00:02:12,019 but even thither it has there's a 52 00:02:17,860 --> 00:02:14,180 trade-off between template complexity 53 00:02:18,940 --> 00:02:17,870 that it can transcribe and process 54 00:02:21,750 --> 00:02:18,950 tivity so we can see that the 55 00:02:25,259 --> 00:02:21,760 full-length product is not in a 56 00:02:28,619 --> 00:02:25,269 and there's a number of stalling that 57 00:02:30,479 --> 00:02:28,629 happens during transcription so at this 58 00:02:32,550 --> 00:02:30,489 point we thought would it be possible 59 00:02:34,740 --> 00:02:32,560 and it would be interesting to make a 60 00:02:37,199 --> 00:02:34,750 polymerase ribozyme that has high 61 00:02:39,740 --> 00:02:37,209 processivity without that feathering and 62 00:02:42,330 --> 00:02:39,750 also that has more biological features 63 00:02:46,130 --> 00:02:42,340 so what I mean by biological features is 64 00:02:48,690 --> 00:02:46,140 looking at bacterial DNA dependent RNA 65 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:48,700 polymerases and one thing that they have 66 00:02:54,420 --> 00:02:51,010 is specificity factors so they use Sigma 67 00:02:56,190 --> 00:02:54,430 factors which recognize promoter region 68 00:02:58,710 --> 00:02:56,200 on the double-stranded DNA template and 69 00:03:00,839 --> 00:02:58,720 it localizes the polymerase to this 70 00:03:02,729 --> 00:03:00,849 promoter region so similarly we're 71 00:03:05,250 --> 00:03:02,739 thinking that we can do the same with an 72 00:03:07,710 --> 00:03:05,260 RNA specificity factor termed here in 73 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:07,720 RNA primer and this primer can recognize 74 00:03:13,319 --> 00:03:10,170 a promoter region on an RNA template by 75 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:13,329 via hybridization and again localize 76 00:03:18,509 --> 00:03:17,170 this polymerase to the template another 77 00:03:20,940 --> 00:03:18,519 thing that the DNA dependent RNA 78 00:03:22,440 --> 00:03:20,950 polymerase is have this process Savini 79 00:03:24,479 --> 00:03:22,450 and the way they get this is either by 80 00:03:28,289 --> 00:03:24,489 clamping onto the DNA template so they 81 00:03:31,710 --> 00:03:28,299 don't associate or by in training the 82 00:03:35,069 --> 00:03:31,720 RNA product so again we think we can do 83 00:03:37,379 --> 00:03:35,079 this by selecting - in vitro selection a 84 00:03:40,229 --> 00:03:37,389 third functional domain a clamped domain 85 00:03:41,640 --> 00:03:40,239 and this domain would be in an open clam 86 00:03:43,710 --> 00:03:41,650 conformation when bound to the 87 00:03:46,020 --> 00:03:43,720 specificity factor the RNA primer and 88 00:03:48,089 --> 00:03:46,030 once the primer is displaced onto the 89 00:03:52,379 --> 00:03:48,099 promoter region of the template this 90 00:03:54,030 --> 00:03:52,389 open clamp domain can close and circling 91 00:03:55,860 --> 00:03:54,040 the template and being able to slide 92 00:04:00,390 --> 00:03:55,870 back and forth on the template in an 93 00:04:02,699 --> 00:04:00,400 untethered fashion so to select for such 94 00:04:06,479 --> 00:04:02,709 a polymerase ribozyme I started with B 95 00:04:08,280 --> 00:04:06,489 six point six one as my progenitor to 96 00:04:09,539 --> 00:04:08,290 make the pool and it has the ligase 97 00:04:11,400 --> 00:04:09,549 course only and in blue 98 00:04:14,699 --> 00:04:11,410 the accessory domain in green and this 99 00:04:16,979 --> 00:04:14,709 is a little cartoon signifying that so 100 00:04:18,990 --> 00:04:16,989 first I designed a five prime primer 101 00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:19,000 binding site shown here in orange and 102 00:04:23,370 --> 00:04:21,130 this is partially complementary to this 103 00:04:25,710 --> 00:04:23,380 RNA primer or the specificity factor and 104 00:04:28,770 --> 00:04:25,720 this serves as the first arm of the 105 00:04:30,300 --> 00:04:28,780 clamp domain for the second arm of the 106 00:04:32,520 --> 00:04:30,310 clamp domain this is where the in vitro 107 00:04:34,440 --> 00:04:32,530 selection comes in handy and I've 108 00:04:35,190 --> 00:04:34,450 appended random sequence so the three 109 00:04:36,990 --> 00:04:35,200 prime end of 110 00:04:39,210 --> 00:04:37,000 the accessory domain and this gave me an 111 00:04:43,680 --> 00:04:39,220 RNA pool with a diversity about 10 to 112 00:04:45,210 --> 00:04:43,690 the 13th this is the general schematic 113 00:04:47,160 --> 00:04:45,220 of the in vitro selection where I 114 00:04:49,410 --> 00:04:47,170 started with a B six point six one DNA 115 00:04:51,600 --> 00:04:49,420 pool that has been fused with random 116 00:04:54,060 --> 00:04:51,610 nucleotides it's being transcribed to 117 00:04:57,060 --> 00:04:54,070 make an RNA pool then multiple selective 118 00:04:59,340 --> 00:04:57,070 steps are undertaken to remove inactive 119 00:05:02,250 --> 00:04:59,350 RNAs while selecting for sliding and 120 00:05:04,200 --> 00:05:02,260 active RNA clamp polymerases which are 121 00:05:07,110 --> 00:05:04,210 then reverse transcribed to make a cDNA 122 00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:07,120 library and then PCR amplified to feed 123 00:05:11,940 --> 00:05:10,330 back into the cycle so to go over in 124 00:05:14,370 --> 00:05:11,950 more details about the Selective steps 125 00:05:16,760 --> 00:05:14,380 I've used the first elliptic selective 126 00:05:19,980 --> 00:05:16,770 step looked for clamping domains alone 127 00:05:22,500 --> 00:05:19,990 so primer was given to the pool to 128 00:05:24,900 --> 00:05:22,510 create this open clam conformation and 129 00:05:27,270 --> 00:05:24,910 then it was incubated on circular 130 00:05:31,680 --> 00:05:27,280 template that has been immobilized on 131 00:05:35,040 --> 00:05:31,690 streptavidin magnetic beads so ribozymes 132 00:05:37,280 --> 00:05:35,050 with functioning clamps would be 133 00:05:39,480 --> 00:05:37,290 directed to the promoter region by the 134 00:05:41,580 --> 00:05:39,490 specificity factor or the RNA primer 135 00:05:43,260 --> 00:05:41,590 where the primer would be displaced and 136 00:05:44,580 --> 00:05:43,270 the clamping domain would go from an 137 00:05:46,680 --> 00:05:44,590 open conformation to a closed 138 00:05:49,590 --> 00:05:46,690 conformation being trapped on the 139 00:05:51,090 --> 00:05:49,600 circular template and now all non 140 00:05:53,760 --> 00:05:51,100 functioning claps would be able to be 141 00:05:58,020 --> 00:05:53,770 washed away at this point to recover 142 00:06:02,550 --> 00:05:58,030 this functioning active ribozymes fresh 143 00:06:04,860 --> 00:06:02,560 primer is added to ask the the clamp to 144 00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:04,870 open back up and this allows collection 145 00:06:09,600 --> 00:06:07,090 of them off the circular template and 146 00:06:11,910 --> 00:06:09,610 we're able to monitor this process by 147 00:06:14,580 --> 00:06:11,920 radio leaving the radio label in the 148 00:06:16,830 --> 00:06:14,590 pool and then the whole process can be 149 00:06:20,610 --> 00:06:16,840 carried out multiple times to increase 150 00:06:22,320 --> 00:06:20,620 the stringency so this is what we did so 151 00:06:24,720 --> 00:06:22,330 by monitoring the pool that comes off 152 00:06:26,400 --> 00:06:24,730 with fresh primer off the beads we're 153 00:06:29,000 --> 00:06:26,410 able to look these are the last two 154 00:06:31,980 --> 00:06:29,010 rounds that used this selection protocol 155 00:06:33,630 --> 00:06:31,990 and the Selective steps hasn't been used 156 00:06:35,610 --> 00:06:33,640 every single round that's why I round 157 00:06:37,260 --> 00:06:35,620 twenty is missing so while we see that 158 00:06:39,450 --> 00:06:37,270 primer recovery is higher than just 159 00:06:41,370 --> 00:06:39,460 buffer recovery and this is the first on 160 00:06:45,600 --> 00:06:41,380 and off event the second and then in 161 00:06:48,090 --> 00:06:45,610 between rounds this amount increases the 162 00:06:50,040 --> 00:06:48,100 second selections scheme looked 163 00:06:52,620 --> 00:06:50,050 both clamping and Templi dependent 164 00:06:56,430 --> 00:06:52,630 extension of a primer so again an open 165 00:06:58,230 --> 00:06:56,440 clamp confirmation was it was done by 166 00:07:00,720 --> 00:06:58,240 adding primer to the pool and then 167 00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:00,730 incubated on a circular template with an 168 00:07:06,210 --> 00:07:03,490 TPS but instead of using a regular CTP 169 00:07:09,840 --> 00:07:06,220 we used an analog upaya tune latest CTP 170 00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:09,850 this way an active polymerase or an 171 00:07:14,430 --> 00:07:11,890 active ribozyme would be able to 172 00:07:17,580 --> 00:07:14,440 incorporate this by 2 in latest CTP into 173 00:07:19,800 --> 00:07:17,590 the extended primer this allows 174 00:07:21,930 --> 00:07:19,810 purification of active by molecular 175 00:07:24,240 --> 00:07:21,940 complexes on script Avenue marinated 176 00:07:26,600 --> 00:07:24,250 beets anything that isn't active is 177 00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:26,610 washed away and again we can monitor the 178 00:07:31,770 --> 00:07:29,050 active guys by recovering them with a 179 00:07:35,220 --> 00:07:31,780 primer focusing on this opening the 180 00:07:37,650 --> 00:07:35,230 clamp one more time so these are the 181 00:07:40,290 --> 00:07:37,660 last three rounds that we did with this 182 00:07:41,820 --> 00:07:40,300 selective step so you can see that the 183 00:07:44,730 --> 00:07:41,830 amount of pool recovered with primer 184 00:07:46,200 --> 00:07:44,740 increases in between each round so this 185 00:07:48,630 --> 00:07:46,210 is the final round of selection that 186 00:07:53,370 --> 00:07:48,640 that we've done so far and we looked at 187 00:07:56,670 --> 00:07:53,380 the activity of this round 27 so first 188 00:07:58,230 --> 00:07:56,680 we looked at at its processivity on the 189 00:07:59,970 --> 00:07:58,240 template that it was selected so I 190 00:08:02,340 --> 00:07:59,980 mentioned that be six point six one was 191 00:08:04,200 --> 00:08:02,350 able to extend 20 nucleotides on a GC 192 00:08:06,750 --> 00:08:04,210 rich template however we used an 8 you 193 00:08:08,010 --> 00:08:06,760 reach template and B six point six one 194 00:08:10,950 --> 00:08:08,020 can only extend about three to four 195 00:08:15,290 --> 00:08:10,960 nucleotides wide around 27 pool is able 196 00:08:19,830 --> 00:08:17,820 we then switched the system from a red 197 00:08:22,110 --> 00:08:19,840 primer red templates to a secondary 198 00:08:24,510 --> 00:08:22,120 green primer green template with a 199 00:08:27,630 --> 00:08:24,520 different promoter and we were able to 200 00:08:29,940 --> 00:08:27,640 see extension over 24 hours quite 201 00:08:32,280 --> 00:08:29,950 precisely and we see about an extension 202 00:08:35,760 --> 00:08:32,290 about 3035 nucleotides on the left side 203 00:08:39,900 --> 00:08:35,770 on template 1 and about 20 to 25 on the 204 00:08:43,320 --> 00:08:39,910 right side on templates 2 and again both 205 00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:43,330 these templates are au rich so then we 206 00:08:47,670 --> 00:08:45,250 wanted to see if a specificity factor is 207 00:08:50,910 --> 00:08:47,680 actually working and we are doing 208 00:08:52,980 --> 00:08:50,920 driving template specific extension so 209 00:08:54,540 --> 00:08:52,990 we took the pool and incubated them with 210 00:08:57,030 --> 00:08:54,550 either the red primer or the green 211 00:08:58,830 --> 00:08:57,040 primer and gave them both templates at 212 00:09:00,780 --> 00:08:58,840 the same time and based on the extension 213 00:09:02,460 --> 00:09:00,790 pattern we can see that with the red 214 00:09:04,920 --> 00:09:02,470 primer there's a preference for the red 215 00:09:09,450 --> 00:09:04,930 template with a green primer there's a 216 00:09:11,610 --> 00:09:09,460 preference for the green template so 217 00:09:13,650 --> 00:09:11,620 I've showed so far that red primer red 218 00:09:15,930 --> 00:09:13,660 templates being extended green primer 219 00:09:17,220 --> 00:09:15,940 green templates being extended we wanted 220 00:09:20,250 --> 00:09:17,230 to see if we're able to make the pool 221 00:09:23,340 --> 00:09:20,260 switch in between templates so once 222 00:09:25,380 --> 00:09:23,350 given into a complex we're able to want 223 00:09:28,560 --> 00:09:25,390 it to see if we can add fresh primer to 224 00:09:31,230 --> 00:09:28,570 open up the clamp give the primer of the 225 00:09:33,780 --> 00:09:31,240 different color and then make a switch 226 00:09:36,630 --> 00:09:33,790 to a secondary template this would allow 227 00:09:38,330 --> 00:09:36,640 for multiple rounds of transcription if 228 00:09:41,790 --> 00:09:38,340 it works properly 229 00:09:44,160 --> 00:09:41,800 now one activity we did not want was the 230 00:09:45,480 --> 00:09:44,170 same complex but if given a primer 231 00:09:47,220 --> 00:09:45,490 that's already hybridized to the 232 00:09:50,450 --> 00:09:47,230 template the clamp domain should remain 233 00:09:53,970 --> 00:09:50,460 closed and stay on the primary template 234 00:09:55,560 --> 00:09:53,980 so the stable at the top just is exactly 235 00:09:58,080 --> 00:09:55,570 like the images from the previous slide 236 00:10:00,390 --> 00:09:58,090 so red primer red template we see 237 00:10:03,870 --> 00:10:00,400 extension green primer green template we 238 00:10:05,670 --> 00:10:03,880 see extension we also see that by 239 00:10:08,240 --> 00:10:05,680 switching primers and templates we're 240 00:10:10,710 --> 00:10:08,250 able to see extensions on the secondary 241 00:10:14,340 --> 00:10:10,720 templates were able to switch templates 242 00:10:17,790 --> 00:10:14,350 however the pool doesn't perfectly stop 243 00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:17,800 the undesired behavior of switching to a 244 00:10:22,890 --> 00:10:19,810 template that's already been primed I'll 245 00:10:25,740 --> 00:10:22,900 be at a lesser extent then when properly 246 00:10:27,690 --> 00:10:25,750 primed and switched over the last thing 247 00:10:29,160 --> 00:10:27,700 we wanted to test since we're selecting 248 00:10:31,680 --> 00:10:29,170 for a sliding clamp domain we 249 00:10:33,390 --> 00:10:31,690 hypothesized that they should see more 250 00:10:36,180 --> 00:10:33,400 processivity with the pool on a circular 251 00:10:39,690 --> 00:10:36,190 template over a linear template as on a 252 00:10:41,400 --> 00:10:39,700 circular template clamped ribozyme would 253 00:10:43,290 --> 00:10:41,410 be able to slide back and forth and not 254 00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:43,300 dissociate from the template where on a 255 00:10:46,710 --> 00:10:45,130 linear it would be able to slide off the 256 00:10:49,170 --> 00:10:46,720 ends and it would lose its primer 257 00:10:51,030 --> 00:10:49,180 template remarkably that's exactly what 258 00:10:52,860 --> 00:10:51,040 we see or there's more processivity on 259 00:10:55,290 --> 00:10:52,870 the circular template in the linear 260 00:10:57,480 --> 00:10:55,300 we're able to see this with the second 261 00:10:59,340 --> 00:10:57,490 green primer and green template and we 262 00:11:00,990 --> 00:10:59,350 also tested five other templates for the 263 00:11:03,900 --> 00:11:01,000 same behavior with different lengths and 264 00:11:05,280 --> 00:11:03,910 we see the same behavior so it's 265 00:11:07,020 --> 00:11:05,290 important to note at this point that all 266 00:11:10,020 --> 00:11:07,030 the data has been done with the 267 00:11:11,640 --> 00:11:10,030 selection pool so what we see is an 268 00:11:13,650 --> 00:11:11,650 average of activities of the different 269 00:11:14,690 --> 00:11:13,660 individuals and just last week we cloned 270 00:11:17,820 --> 00:11:14,700 in sequenced 271 00:11:21,390 --> 00:11:17,830 45 clones of the pool and we have to 272 00:11:23,160 --> 00:11:21,400 further characterized the individuals 273 00:11:27,060 --> 00:11:23,170 inside the pool to look for the optimal 274 00:11:29,190 --> 00:11:27,070 activity so just to conclude comparing 275 00:11:31,800 --> 00:11:29,200 our in-vitro selected polymerase 276 00:11:33,630 --> 00:11:31,810 ribozyme with the DNA dependent RNA 277 00:11:35,280 --> 00:11:33,640 polymerase although RNA might never be 278 00:11:37,530 --> 00:11:35,290 able to get the proximity of a protein 279 00:11:39,330 --> 00:11:37,540 we're able to increase the profit eekum 280 00:11:41,430 --> 00:11:39,340 pair to the progenitor be six point six 281 00:11:43,860 --> 00:11:41,440 one on a you rich templates we're also 282 00:11:47,250 --> 00:11:43,870 able to show promoter recognition using 283 00:11:49,530 --> 00:11:47,260 an RNA specificity factor and we were 284 00:11:50,910 --> 00:11:49,540 partially able to show a switching of 285 00:11:53,220 --> 00:11:50,920 templates which can lead to multiple 286 00:11:55,260 --> 00:11:53,230 replication events and we believe that 287 00:11:58,290 --> 00:11:55,270 the process civet e and the switching of 288 00:11:59,640 --> 00:11:58,300 templates are linked and then we have to 289 00:12:01,590 --> 00:11:59,650 characterize the pool to find 290 00:12:03,780 --> 00:12:01,600 individuals that are better at doing 291 00:12:05,880 --> 00:12:03,790 both these processes and the last 292 00:12:07,470 --> 00:12:05,890 question that remains unanswered even in 293 00:12:09,360 --> 00:12:07,480 the field is how do we do strand 294 00:12:13,830 --> 00:12:09,370 displacement perhaps with a fourth 295 00:12:16,380 --> 00:12:13,840 fourth domain but yes so once RNA is 296 00:12:19,100 --> 00:12:16,390 transcribed of an RNA template how do we 297 00:12:21,570 --> 00:12:19,110 get it to come off without he donation 298 00:12:24,060 --> 00:12:21,580 with that I would like to thank my 299 00:12:31,800 --> 00:12:24,070 supervisor dr. Ron Rao my lab member is 300 00:12:44,380 --> 00:12:41,260 time for one question maybe two yeah so 301 00:12:45,820 --> 00:12:44,390 your list of features on protein enzymes 302 00:12:48,640 --> 00:12:45,830 I think there's something really missing 303 00:12:51,040 --> 00:12:48,650 there in that they are motors they they 304 00:12:53,800 --> 00:12:51,050 take chemical energy and they do work 305 00:12:57,010 --> 00:12:53,810 with it in a really directed way and I 306 00:12:58,690 --> 00:12:57,020 and I think on your list where you you 307 00:13:00,670 --> 00:12:58,700 know you're just not you're not doing 308 00:13:02,380 --> 00:13:00,680 that being possessive by locking it onto 309 00:13:06,130 --> 00:13:02,390 the template is not the same thing as 310 00:13:07,810 --> 00:13:06,140 making it into a directed motor yes so 311 00:13:10,840 --> 00:13:07,820 there's been multiple publications where 312 00:13:13,180 --> 00:13:10,850 even the protein polymerases have had 313 00:13:16,300 --> 00:13:13,190 their clamps removed and their proximity 314 00:13:19,030 --> 00:13:16,310 goes way lower by thousandfold so 315 00:13:21,220 --> 00:13:19,040 clamping does play a major role in being 316 00:13:23,710 --> 00:13:21,230 processive but they're they're 317 00:13:26,590 --> 00:13:23,720 definitely more complex and can go much 318 00:13:30,700 --> 00:13:26,600 further distances than an RNA polymerase 319 00:13:34,180 --> 00:13:30,710 would ever be able to I'm allowed to 320 00:13:35,860 --> 00:13:34,190 have one question so first I think he 321 00:13:39,520 --> 00:13:35,870 does have some form of a motor because 322 00:13:41,410 --> 00:13:39,530 the hydrolysis of each ntp drives it 323 00:13:43,630 --> 00:13:41,420 forward as long as you bind to this 324 00:13:46,090 --> 00:13:43,640 interface so you that could be an 325 00:13:48,580 --> 00:13:46,100 analogy to motor my question or 326 00:13:50,080 --> 00:13:48,590 suggestion is in our hands high 327 00:13:52,090 --> 00:13:50,090 throughput sequencing has been 328 00:13:54,370 --> 00:13:52,100 incredibly powerful in analyzing these 329 00:13:56,530 --> 00:13:54,380 rounds and that not only allows you to 330 00:13:58,870 --> 00:13:56,540 cluster sequences but also to find 331 00:14:01,150 --> 00:13:58,880 sequences that are getting enriched 332 00:14:04,120 --> 00:14:01,160 within one cluster and Irene Chen has 333 00:14:05,590 --> 00:14:04,130 been teaching us how to do that are you 334 00:14:07,030 --> 00:14:05,600 planning to do that yes so we're 335 00:14:08,920 --> 00:14:07,040 planning to do high throughput 336 00:14:10,660 --> 00:14:08,930 sequencing so again this was just the 337 00:14:14,950 --> 00:14:10,670 data from last week I was analyzing them 338 00:14:18,030 --> 00:14:14,960 in in the hotel room but yes and we 339 00:14:21,460 --> 00:14:18,040 might carry out a couple more selective 340 00:14:23,730 --> 00:14:21,470 schemes to get them a little further and 341 00:14:26,260 --> 00:14:23,740 then we do high throughput sequencing 342 00:14:28,190 --> 00:14:26,270 all right great let's thank Rosalyn 343 00:14:28,700 --> 00:14:28,200 again next time